It’s that time of year again, when thousands of toads are migrating across busy roads toward their breeding grounds — and hundreds of human crossing guards are there to make sure they arrive safely without being squashed by cars.
“Toad Detour” takes place each spring in and around Philadelphia’s Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education.
The operation is designed to protect the thousands of local American toads that leave the Schuylkill Center’s 340 acres of forest, where they’ve been sleeping through the winter, to head for a nearby reservoir where they’ll make a whole lot of babies.
That’s all good, except for the perilous part of the journey that involves crossing two city streets, points out the Schuylkill Center’s Claire Morgan. She has the world’s best job title, “toad detour coordinator,” and the duty of ensuring that traffic is rerouted on nights when the migration is taking place.
To help these critters make it to where they’ll be able to make it, volunteers block traffic with plastic barriers for a couple of hours every night, with city permission.
They also help corral any toads that hop outside barricaded areas.
Toad detouring started in 2009, when local animal lover Lisa Levinson noticed toads were meeting their maker instead of their mates. She decided to help them out by organizing volunteers and securing permits to close off the roads. The program’s been officially part of the Schuylkill Center since 2011. (You can see some great video from previous years in the documentary at the top of the page.)
Last year, some 300 volunteers including families, scouts
Pitching speed, player’s height, and pitching for multiple teams may correlate with a history of shoulder and elbow injuries, according to new research.
HANOVER, Germany, March 28 (UPI) — Festo makes robots inspired by nature. Its winged drone may be its most realistic yet. The eMotionButterflies look, fly and behave like real butterflies.
Just how long would it take to fall through the center of the Earth, traveling from one side of our planet to the other?
Physicists have long calculated the answer to that question as being 42 minutes, but now, new calculations show that the theoretical trip would actually take around 38 minutes — and we can blame gravity for the discrepancy.
The traditional calculation to measure a fall through Earth assumes that our planet has a constant density throughout its many layers. Since the gravitational attraction between two objects is proportional to their masses (or density) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them, if Earth’s density were constant, the only change in gravity we’d experience would be due to how far we were from Earth’s center.
But as Alexander Klotz, a graduate student at McGill University in Canada, came up with the new calculations, he took into consideration how Earth’s density changes layer by layer. And as a result, the gravitational speed at which we would fall through each layer changed too.
Klotz measured the different densities found in Earth’s interior using seismic data. Indeed, our planet has a less dense crust and mantle and a more dense core, Science magazine reported.
A paper describing the new thought experiment results was published in the March 2015 issue of the American Journal of Physics.
“This is the kind of paper we love,” Dr. David Jackson, editor of the journal and a physicist at Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, told Science magazine. “This is a nice addition to the classic problem.”
Want to learn more about our planet’s internal layers? Take a journey to the center of the Earth in the “Talk Nerdy To Me” video
An exhibition at London’s Science Museum and a philosophising book explore our desire for food, while another new book exposes the food industry’s dark secrets
A multinational group of paleontologists has described a prehistoric lobster-like animal from the Marble Canyon site, part of the renowned Canadian Burgess Shale fossil deposit. The newly-discovered marine creature, named Yawunik kootenayi, lived during the middle Cambrian, approximately 508 million years ago. The species name, kootenayi, honors the Ktunaxa People, who have long inhabited the [...]
WENCHUAN COUNTY, China, March 28 (UPI) — Two years worth of GPS tracking data revealed pandas appear to socialize in the wild — or at least tolerate each other’s company.
Men might be growing beards to appear more attractive to women and more dominant to other men, a study on monkeys suggests
Giant pandas continue to fascinate us, as we try to fill gaps in our knowledge about them.
On March 19, Nick Bilton, technology columnist at The New York Times, wrote an article in the newspaper entitled “New Gadgets, New Health Worries.” Approximately half of the piece was about the possible health hazards posed by the new Apple Watch and other smart watches; the other half concerned the health hazards associated with the use of cellphones. “We have long suspected that cellphones, which give off low levels of radiation, could lead to brain tumors, cancer, disturbed blood rhythms, and other health problems if held too close to the body for extended periods,” Bilton wrote.
Later in his column, he declared that the most definitive and unbiased findings leading to this suspicion had come from the conclusions of a panel of 31 scientists from 14 nations that had been convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization, located in Lyon, France. Bilton described the panel’s findings as follows: “After dissecting dozens of peer-reviewed studies on cellphone safety, the panel concluded in 2011 that cellphones were ‘possibly carcinogenic’ and that the devices could be as harmful as certain dry-cleaning chemicals and pesticides.” He cited the results of one of these studies, which had been conducted by the well known Swedish oncologist and epidemiologist Dr. Lennart Hardell, who had found that prolonged use of cell phones could “triple” the risk of developing a certain type of brain cancer, and that cell phone radiation might be especially harmful to the developing brains of children.
Toward the end of his column, Bilton told his readers that he had “stopped holding my cell phone next to my head and instead use a headset.”
Within hours, Bilton was taken to the woodshed by none other than Margaret Sullivan, the Times‘ public editor,