How Educators Are Starting To Embrace The Concept Of ‘Good Screen Time’

Video games have a bad reputation among many parents and teachers, who worry that too much screen time is bad for children.

There’s no doubt that some kids go overboard — and those who do can face troubling health risks. But a body of research suggests that playing digital games can have psychological and even physical benefits — from increasing players’ “brain flexibility” to possibly improving eyesight. And new offerings from game makers like Leapfrog, National Geographic, Amplify Games and Galxyz may further assuage parents and teachers’ fears.

“There is a developing notion of good screen time versus bad screen time,” said Osman Rashid, founder and CEO of Galxyz, a game maker in Los Altos, California. “Good screen time” can include using games that make players strategize, analyze and think quickly, he said, while bad screen time generally involves doing something more passive, like watching a video.

Rashid, who has two daughters, was disappointed there weren’t more games he felt both entertained and challenged kids.

“Most learning games had shoddy graphics, poorly developed interfaces and fake gaming,” he said.

So Rashid set out to create one that would teach players about science — and actually appeal to kids.

Galxyz games can help kids learn about a variety of disciplines, from physical and life science to Earth and space science, and the company recently partnered with the New York Academy of Sciences to help deliver a new educational product.

Kids can play these games at home, or the programs can be incorporated into a teacher’s syllabus. Fifty-five percent of educators surveyed by the Games and Learning Publishing Council last year said their students played games in their classrooms at least once a week.

Rashid noted he appreciates seeing teachers realizing educational games won’t —> Read More